Atlas+Reviews


 * Atlas Reviews**

Just as in map critiques, atlases must deal with the communication of geographic information. Those major design problems that interfere with communication may render the atlas useless, or at least less useful. Minor problems that do not interfere with communication are acceptable. As always, it is important to learn how to understand the differences between minor and major problems and their overall impact on the communication process.

__Some questions for atlas reviewers__ 1. Are maps in the atlas arranged logically (by chapter, or section)? 2. Is the map design reasonably consistent throughout the atlas? a. Use of color b. Use of text (font, size, style) c. Use of symbols (point, line, area) 3. Does the atlas have a coherent theme 4. Does the atlas seem to dwell on one particular form of symbolization, or is there some variety in symbol use? 5. Is the page layout appropriate and pleasing to the eye? 6. Is there a sensible integration of explanatory text and maps? 7. Are the maps relevant to the geographical area and/or theme of the atlas? 8. Are there any obvious __gaps__ in the geographical areas or themes? 9. Is the cost of the atlas (if available) appropriate? 10. If you are critical of an atlas, how would you improve it’s design?

See Map Geek atlas reviews Take me back to Design Critiques I want to go Home